SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(MP) 315

SHACHEENDRA DWIVEDI
KU. ANJU KHATRI – Appellant
Versus
GYANCHAND – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.Raj Sharma, J.P.Gupta, J.P.SHARMA, Raghuvir Singh

SHACHEENDRA DWIVEDI, J.

( 1 ) THIS case was registered on a letter from the prosecutrix Ku. Anju Khatri relating to the case registered for an offence under Sections 376/34, I. P. C. wherein, accused Gyanchand and Kamal Jain were apprehended by Police, Vidisha. The two accused having been allowed bail by the trial Court the cancellation thereof and the transfer of the case from the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Vidisha (Sh P. D. Maran) is prayed. Earlier, on an application being made by accused Gyanchand for bail, this Court having considered all the available material and the circumstances of the case had dismissed the application under a detailed order dated 18-3-91 in Cr. Misc. Case No. 448/91. On facts, the case of co-accused Kamal Jain is also similar and not distinguishable from accused Gyanchand.

( 2 ) LATER, a further application for bail was made by accused Gyanchand on a special ground of illness of his father, submitting that his presence was required for attending his father, but that too was dismissed on 4-7-91 in Cr. Misc. Case No. 1243/91.

( 3 ) A brief narration of facts would facilitate the further discussion. According to prosecution, when prosecutrix Ku. Anj






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top