SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(MP) 173

S.K.DUBEY
RAJENDRA SINGH – Appellant
Versus
SURENDRA SINGH – Respondent


S. K. DUBEY, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision under Section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short the 'code'), is against the order dated 25-3-1987, passed by First Additional Sessions Judge, Morena, in Criminal Revision 171/85 preferred against the order dated 4-9-1985 passed in Criminal Case No. 191/84 by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Morena.

( 2 ) FACTS leading to this revision are thus: the non-petitioner/complainant Dr Surendra Singh and the petitioner/accused Rajendra Singh are real brothers. The non-petitioner filed a complaint u/ss. 420 and 467 of the Indian Penal Code (for short the 'ipc') and Section 45 of the Advocates Act, 1961 (for short the 'act') against the petitioner, on the allegations that the petitioner/accused was a Deputy Ranger, who was convicted and sentenced for an offence u/s. 409 IPC on 31-7-1964 in Criminal Case No. 202/64 by the Additional District Magistrate (Judicial), Tikamgarh, that conviction and sentence was maintained by the High Court. The petitioner after manipulating the proceedings got himself declared as dead, thereafter, the petitioner without getting himself enrolled as an advocate on the roll of the State Bar Council, is practisin














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top