SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(MP) 851

S.K.CHAWLA, S.K.DUBEY
GWALIOR STEELS PVT. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
MADHYA PRADESH ELECTRICITY BOARD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.M.Naik, C.P.Singh, K.N.Gupta, M.L.JAISWAL

S. K. CHAWLA, J.

( 1 ) THE question involved in this writ petition is, whether a consumer of high tension industrial power, on account of interrupted supply of electrical energy due to power cuts, is relieved of the obligation to pay minimum monthly charges and is liable to pay only to the extent of electrical energy actually consumed by him ?

( 2 ) THE petitioner, M/s. Gwalior Steels Private Limited, is a Company under the Companies Act, 1956, having a Mini Steel Plant at Banmore, District Morena, M. P. , manufacturing special alloy steel castings and Sections. The plant was granted high tension industrial power connection by Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board (respondent herein) under an agreement, Annexure A. It was undertaken under the agreement that the petitioner would be supplied electricity for a load of 3500 K. V. A. (Kilo Volt Amperes) on 33 K. V. That demand of electricity having been contracted to be supplied is called "contract demand", a phrase which may have to be used in discussion hereafter.

( 3 ) IT is easy to visualise that there may be two kinds of bases to charge for the electricity. One basis may be to charge it on the rate of inflow or load of electricity suppli






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top