( 1 ) OVER a, petty matter, the petitioner, defendant-wife, in a matrimonial proceedings has been required to knock the doors of this Court for the second time. The controversy catching the attention of the trial Court as well as this Court for the moment arises out of applications under Order 7, Rule 11, C. P. C. and Order 6, Rule 17, C. P. C. filed respectively by the defendant and the plaintiff. Earlier when the wife-petitioner had come up to this Court in C. R. No. 209/92, her application under Order 7, Rule 11, C. P. C. calling for rejection of the plaint had been rejected by the trial Court directing her to file the written-statement. Applications seeking amendment of the plaint were also pending. This Court had directed:-". . . . . . . THE revision is allowed, the impugned order rejecting the application under Order 7, Rule 11, C. P. C. is set aside. Instead the trial Court is directed to take up the plaintiff / non-petitioner's application under Order 6, Rule 17 as also the defendant/petitioner's application under Order 7, Rule 11, C. P. C. for consideration. In the event of the trial Court rejecting the application for amendment, the defendant's application