SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(MP) 67

P.N.S.CHOUHAN, D.K.JAIN
RAMKRIPAL ALIAS BHALLU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.M.TRIVEDI, PRASHANT SINGH

P. N. S. CHOUHAN, J.

( 1 ) APPELLANT's family had old and deep-rooted enmity with the family of Ganga Prasad (deceased ). On 9-3-1985 Ganga Prasad had thrown car-cass of his Ox in his field which started emitting such obnoxious odour that labourers working at the construction site of the appellant stopped work. Though Ganga Prasad promised to remove the car-cass on being asked by Ramkripal he had not done so till 11-3-1985. On that date at 7-00 a. m. weilding a licensed single barrel 12 bore gun he went to the house of Ganga Prasad to remind him in this behalf. These facts are not disputed.

( 2 ) AS per prosecution, the appellant demanded as to why the car-cass was not removed and on Ganga Prasad saying that he will get it removed no sooner the sun was bit warmer, the appellant hurled filthy abuses at him and shot him dead on the spot. His mother Gujratiya came there and protested only to be shot dead by the appellant. The defence version is that Ganga Prasad and his sons tried to snatch away the gun from the appellant and in that process the fire-arm accidentally went off killing both the deceased. The appellant along with his four sons was tried on charge of riot, attempt to comm





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top