SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(MP) 2

GULAB C.GUPTA, P.P.NAOLEKAR
R. J. FOUZAR BUS SERVICE, HOSHANGABAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.K.RAVAT, V.K.TANKHA

P. P. NAOLEKAR, J.

( 1 ) THIS order shall also govern the disposal of M. P. No. 3155/91 (Ramchandra Jhadwani v. State of M. P.), M. P. No. 2549/91 (Harichand v. State), M. P. No. 2519/91 (Ramswarop Shrivastava v. State), M. P. No. 2476/91 (H. S. Dhanjal v. State), M. P. No. 2525/91 (District Transport Service v. State), M. P. No. 2827/91 (K. P. Pandey v. State), M. P. No. 1365/92 (Channulal Rai v. State), M. P. No. 2621/91 (Jageram Sharma v. State), M. P. No. 2520/91 (Kailesh Narayan Rai v. State), M. P. NO. 2605 91 (Aisha Bai v. State), M. P. No. 2562/91 (Narsingh Bus Service v. State), M. P. No. 2679/91 (M/s. Chhanga Raja Bus Service v. State), M. P. No. 2493/91 (M/s. Raipur Bus Service v. State), M. P. No. 2583/91 (Pt. Lalaram Bajpai v. State), M. P. No. 2956/91 (Laxmansingh v. State), M. P. No. 2211/91 (Dhannasingh v. State), M. P. No. 3683/91 (Ratanlal v. State), M. P. No. 2804/91 (Mansingh v. State), M. P. No. 3486/91 (Dineshchand Agnihotri v. State), M. P. No. 3205/91 (Jai Prakash Narayan Rai v. State), M. P. No. 2578/91 (Sardar Bhajansingh v. State), M. P. No. 2497/91 (New Bus Trans. Co. Service v. State), M. P. No. 2551/91 (M/s. Mewadas and Co. v. State), M. P. 2458/91 (Ra











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top