( 1 ) ALL these petitions viz. M. P. No. 1466/90 (Nandkishore Sharma v. R. D. Richariya); M. P. No. 2220/91 (R. R. Dubdy v. State of M. P.); M. P. No. 2409/91 (Jai Prakash Sahakari Griha Nirman Samiti v. State of M. P.); Misc. Petition No. 2682/91 (Janta Griha Nirman Sahkari Samiti v. State of M. P.); Misc. Petition No. 2700/91 (Jagdish Prasad Sahu v. State of M. P.); Misc. Petition No. 3319/91 (Vidyug Shramik Griha Nirman Sahkari Samiti v. State of M. P.); M. P. No. 3337 /91 (Mahakoshal Griha Nirman Sahkari Samiti v. State); M. P. No. 4554/91 (Amrapali Griha Nirman Sahkari Samiti v. State of M. P.); M. P. 2272/93 (Vasundhara Griha Nirman Sahkarisamiti v. Siate of M. P.); M. P. 3878/93 (Army Personal Resettlements v. State; M. P. No. 4688/ 93 (Mansoor Ahmad v. State of M. P.) and M. P. No. 3068/87 (Purushottamdas Tandan v. State of M. P.), involved a common question of law and, therefore, they are disposed of by a common order. For convenient disposal of all these petitions, facts given in the case of Pushpak Grah Nirman Sahakari Samiti are taken into consideration.

( 2 ) THE petitioners by this petition have challenged the validity of the Madhya Pradesh Vinirdisht