SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(MP) 467

TEJ SHANKAR
MATADIN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.Raj Sharma, R.K.VASHISTHA

TEJ SHANKAR, J.

( 1 ) THIS application for bail u/s 439 (1) of the Cr. P. C. has been moved on behalf of Matadin who has claimed himself 15 years of age. It appears that accused-applicant was arrested on 25. 3. 1994 in connection with crime No. 67194 under the Narcotic Drug and Psychotropics Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter called the N. D. P. S. Act ). It was claimed that the land where the cannabis plants GANJE KE PEDT were standing is owned and possessed by coaccused Bhagwan Singh and he cultivated the land himself. The applicant is less than 16 years of age. The learned special Judge granted him bail till 29. 4. 1994 for appearing him in examination.

( 2 ) I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the State at length. The learned counsel for the applicant contended that the applicant is less than 16 years of age and his case has to be governed by the provisions of the Juvenile Justice Act, 1985. The learned special judge should have proceeded to hold an enquiry about the age and should have acted thereafter in accordance with the provisions of the Juvenile Justice Act in case the applicant was found below 16 years, of age. He also pointed out that the copy






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top