SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(MP) 516

T.S.DOABIA
SHRIPAT RAO – Appellant
Versus
RAGHUVIRSINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.K.LAHRI, M.M.Kaushik, R.D.Jain

T. S. DOABIA, J.

( 1 ) THE plaintiffs were successful in the trial court but were unable to convince the lower appellate court. The verdict having gone against them they have preferred this second appeal.

( 2 ) THE case of the plaintiffs is that they were in need of money. They accordingly proposed to the defendant to advance some amount by way of loan. It is stated that the defendant agreed to advance a loan on the condition that a proper security should be furnished. The condition laid down was that the plaintiffs should execute a sale deed in favour of the defendant. It was also agreed that in the event of repayment of the loan amount with interest at the rate of 6 per cent per annum the defendant would reconvey the land to the plaintiffs. The outer limit for reconveyance was fixed as 5 years. It is stated that on above arrangement having been agreed upon the plaintiffs sold their land vide two agreements executed on 27/06/1962 in favour of the defendant. The land which was subject-matter of the two registered sale deeds is located in survey No. 1386 and 1387 and is as under: survey No. Area 261 0. 16 259 6. 00 360 4. 03 370 8. 16 372 6. 07 374 2. 07 344/1115 0. 11 355/1116 1. 01





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top