1994 Supreme(MP) 813
High Court Of Madhya Pradesh
U. L. BHAT, M. V. TAMASKAR, RAJEEV GUPTA
RAJENDRA SINGH - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M.P. - Respondents
MISC. PETN. 2360 Of 1992
Decided On : 09/28/1994
ANUP CHOUDHARY
Section 32-A of the NDPS Act bars the suspension or remission of sentences awarded under the Act, except for those under Section 27, and this bar extends to the release on license under the 1954 Act.
Headnote:
NARCOTIC DRUGS AND PSYCHOTROPIC SUBSTANCES ACT - SECTION 32-A - M. P. PRISONERS' RELEASE ON PROBATION ACT, 1954 - SECTION 2 - PERSONS CONVICTED UNDER N. D. P. S. ACT - NOT ENTITLED TO RELEASE ON LICENCE - SECTION 32-A BARS SUSPENSION OF SENTENCE.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, convicted under Section 8 read with Section 18 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act), sought release on license under the M. P. Prisoners' Release on Probation Act, 1954 (1954 Act). The State relied on an earlier Division Bench decision holding that persons convicted under Section 8 read with Section 18 of the NDPS Act are not governed by the 1954 Act.
Finding of the Court:
The Court held that the provisions of the 1954 Act and the rules framed thereunder cannot be applied to persons convicted under the provisions of the NDPS Act, other than Section 27. The Court reasoned that Section 32-A of the NDPS Act bars the appellate or revisional Court from suspending the sentence imposed on a person under the provisions of the NDPS Act other than Section 27.
Issues: Whether the provisions of the 1954 Act and the rules framed thereunder can be applied to persons convicted under the provisions of the NDPS Act, other than Section 27.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court interpreted Section 32-A of the NDPS Act, which prohibits the suspension or remission of sentences awarded under the Act, except for those under Section 27. The Court held that the release on license under the 1954 Act is not a suspension or remission of sentence in the strict sense, but it is similar to the suspension contemplated in Section 432 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC). However, the Court found that Section 32-A of the NDPS Act clearly bars the appellate or revisional Court from suspending the sentence imposed on a person under the provisions of the NDPS Act other than Section 27.
Final Decision: The Court dismissed the petition, holding that the petitioner was not entitled to the benefit of the 1954 Act.
( 1 ) THE petitioner herein was convicted u/s. 8, read with Section 18 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, (for short, the Act) and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 10 years and to pay a fine of Rs. one lac with default sentence of imprisonment for two years by the Special Court, Ratlam. His appeal was dismissed by the High Court. Having undergone a part of the sentence, he submitted an application to the State Government for release on licence u/s. 2 of the M. P. Prisoners' Release on Probation Act, 1954, (for short, the Act of 1954 ). During the pendency of the application, he filed the present writ petition for issue of a writ of habeas corpus and release on bail pending consideration of his application for release on licence under the 1954 Act. This writ petition was heard at Indore Bench by a Division Bench consisting of V. D. Gyani J. and S. D. Jha J. The State relied on an earlier unreported decision of a Division Bench consisting of A. G. Qureshi, J. and S. D. Jha, J. in Jagtar Singh v. State of MP, M. P. No. 534/91, holding that a person convicted u/s. 8, read with Section 18 of the N. D. P. S. Act is not governed by the provisions of the 1954, Act. The judgment is a brief one and does not give any reasons for the view taken. Gyani J. took the view that the earlier Division Bench decision requires reconsideration. The Division Bench, therefore, referred the matter to a Larger Bench. That is how the case has come before us.
( 2 ) THE 1954 Act has been enacted to provide for the release on licence of certain prisoners on conditions imposed by the Government. The State Government has framed M. P. Prisoners Release on Probation Rules, 1954, in exercise of rule making power conferred on it u/s. 9 of the 1954 Act. Section 9 (4) empowers the Government to make rules for defining the classes of offenders who may be conditionally released. Rule 3 prescribes the classes of persons who shall not be released under the Act. Since the Act was enacted and the rules were framed long before the coming into force of the N. D. P. S. Act, the question of Rule 3 including or not including persons convicted under the provisions of N. D. P. S. Act in the classes prescribed under Rule 3 does not arise.
( 3 ) OUR attention is invited to Section 32-A of the N. D. P. S. Act which was incorporated by Amendment Act No. 2 of 1989. It read thus :"notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974) or any other law for the time being in force, but subject to the provisions of Section 33, no sentence awarded under this Act (other than Section 27), shall be suspended or remitted or commuted. "sections 15 to 31-A prescribes punishments for certain offences. Section 32 prescribes punishment for offence for which no punishment is provided under the N. D. P. S. Act. Section 27 deals with punishment for illegal possession in small quantity for personal consumption of any narcotic drug or psychotropic substance or consumption of such drug or substance. Under clause (a), maximum sentence prescribed is imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year or with fine or with both. Under clause (b), the maximum sentence prescribed is imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months or with fine or with both. Apparently, the offences dealt with u/s. 27 are regarded as minor offences and comparatively lesser sentences are prescribed. Obviously, this is the reason why sentence u/s. 27 of the Act has been excluded from the purview of Section 32-A of the N. D. P. S. Act.
( 4 ) SECTION 32-A of the N. D. P. S. Act excludes sentences awarded other than under Section 27, from suspension, remission or commutation. These expressions are no doubt found in the Criminal Procedure Code. Section 389 of the Code deals with suspension of sentence pending appeal and release of the appellant on bail. Section 432 confers on the appropriate Government power to suspend or remit sentence