SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(MP) 39

A.S.TRIPATHI
BEDARIA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.K.JAIN, V.K.Saxena

A. S. TRIPATHI, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 21st September, 1988 passed by JInd Additional Sessions Judge of Morena, whereby the appeal of the petitioners was dismissed maintaining their conviction u/sections 457 and 380 IPC and their sentence of two years R. I. each on both counts. The two sentences were directed to run consecutively.

( 2 ) THE facts of the case are that a theft had occurred in the night between 617th of May, 1976 in the house of one Bhawar Singh, PW 1. The ladies of the house were sleeping on the roof. It was known in the morning that a theft had taken place in the house. A report was lodged. The matter was investigated. On 27th May, 1976, one of the accused namely Bedaria was arrested from whose possession, one Mouser gun and other articles were recovered and recovery memos Exs. P. 13 and P. 14 were proved on record. Similarly, on 16th June, 1976, other co-accused Raghunath (since dead) was arrested and some articles like ornaments, cash etc. were recovered from his possession vide recovery memos Exs. P. 9, P. io and P. 11 which were proved on record. On 11th of July, 1976 accused/petitioner Kailashi was also ar













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top