SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(MP) 335

D.P.S.CHAUHAN
PAWAN KUMAR KHULLAR – Appellant
Versus
KAUSHAL LEATHER BOARD LIMITED – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
KHANDANA MUKHERJI

D. P. S. CHAUHAN, J.

( 1 ) THE petition contains a prayer for winding up of the Company known as 'kaushal Leather Board Limited', which is a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956.

( 2 ) LEARNED counsel relied on provisions of Section 433 sub-section (c) in support of her submissions for order of the winding up of the Company. Sub-section (e) of Section 433 of the Companies Act, 1956 is as extracted below:"433. A company may be wound up by the Court :- (e) if the company is unable to pay its debts;"

( 3 ) THE petition is at the behest of Pawan Kumar Khullar, who was an employee of the company and his salary has not been paid by the company and, therefore, for not payment of the salary the petitioner has approached this Court and prayed that company itself be wound up. The provision as relied on by the learned counsel for the petitioner says that the company may be wound up by the Court if the company is unable to pay the debts.

( 4 ) THERE is difference between debt and salary. The salary is the remuneration paid to a person or employee in lieu of services rendered by him/her whereas debt in not remuneration. Debt is something which is borrowed by a person on settled terms






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top