SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(MP) 853

S.K.DUBEY
KAMESH CHANDRA SRIVASTAVA – Appellant
Versus
BOARD OF REVENUE, MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent


S. K. DUBEY, J.

( 1 ) BY this petition under Article 226 and 227 of the constitution of India, the petitioner has challanged the order of the Board of Revenue (Annexure-P/11) dated 3 7-108 whereby the order passed in appeal No 28-5-85 preferred against the order dated 9-4-1985 (Annexure-P/10)passed by the Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies in case No. 77-112/82 wherein the order of Assistant Registrar passed in case No. 2 80 (Annexure-P/a), betul on 11-9-1982 was set aside and the order of termination of the petitioner services dated 6-5-1980 was quashed directing the petitioner to be reinstated with backwages.

( 2 ) FACTS giving rise to this petition are thus i the petitioner was appointed as Assistant Accountant in the respondent Bank on 30-7-l976. Thereafter, the petitioner vide order dated 19-8-1978 (Annexure-P/2) was appointed temporarily in the regular pay-scale of Rs. 110-5-2 0-EB-6-270-0 300-15-300 of accountant. On a complaint made by one Jairam Gujia, a charge-sheet dated 18-5-1975 was issued to the petitioner as the auditor found petitioner guilty of with drawing the amount of rs 2 000/-by putting a false thumb impression of Gujia, petitioner denied the charge and e









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top