SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(MP) 1076

FAIZAN UDDIN
NISHA SINGHAL – Appellant
Versus
M. P. HOUSING BOARD, BHOPAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.H.Upadhyaya, H.P.Mittal

D. M. DHARMADHIKARI, J.

( 1 ) THIS letters patent appeal has been preferred against the judgment of the learned single Judge dated 20-8-1994, whereby the writ petition filed by the appellant being M. P. No. 445 of 1993, has been dismissed.

( 2 ) THE facts, not in dispute, are that MIG House No. 185 in Pandit Dindayal Nagar Colony of Gwalior was allotted to the appellant under the Housing Hire-Purchase Scheme of the Madhya Pradesh Housing Board. The agreed price payable by instalments was Rs. 1,58,000/- which the appellant is prepared to pay and states that, in fact, has been paid by now. The appellant is aggrieved by the impugned demand (Annexure-P/9) whereby some excess money, not initially agreed, is being demanded, resulting in enhancement of the cost of the house to Rs. 1,93,653/ -. The contention of the appellant before the learned single Judge in the writ petition was that the additional price claimed under several heads is contrary to the terms of the agreement reached between the parties and is also otherwise totally arbitrary and without any justification. The appellant had claimed a writ for being delivered possession of the house on payment of the initially agreed price.













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top