A. K. MATHUR, C. J.

( 1 ) BOTH the letters patent appeals are connected; therefore, they are disposed of by a common order. Respondent Jitendra Kishore Bhargava filed a first petition - W. P. No. 3111 of 1995 before this Court claiming admission to the Post-Graduate Course and the learned single Judge in that petition passed order dated 17-10-1995 relying on Rule XI (i) of the Madhya Pradesh Medical and Dental Post-Graduate Entrance Examination Rules, 1995 (for short the Rules of 1995) that the petitioner should file a representation before the State Government along with certified copy of this order and the State Government shall decide the representation within two weeks after the presentation of the representation by a speaking order regarding subsequent counseling in terms of above Rule XI (i) holding of second counselling even after Second July, if there is no other impediment in the way. Tough it was contended before the learned single Judge that the representation was made to the Director of medical Education but the learned Judge found that the representation does not contain any endorsement forwarding copy to the State Government. It was found that there was no representat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document