S.C.PANDEY
KASHIRAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is an appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter the CPC for short) filed by the plaintiff against the judgment and decree dated 26-7-86, passed by the First Additional Judge to the Court of District Judge, Hoshangabad in Civil Appeal No. 53-A/81 arising out of judgment and decree dated 1-5-81, passed by Civil Judge, Class II, Sohagpur in Civil Suit No. 40-A/8o.
( 2 ) THE appellant filed a suit for declaration of his title and for permanent injunction restraining the respondent No. 1 from interfering with his possession or the land. It was also claimed that the order passed by the competent authority and the Sub-Divisional Officer, Sohagpur in Revenue Case No. 735/a/90 B (3) 74-75 u/s. 11 of the M. P. Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings Act, 1960 (hereinafter the Act for short) be declared void. The appellant claimed that he was holding Khasra No. of 80,8. 87 acres of land situate in village Dhadhiyakishore, Tahsil Sohagpur, District Hoshangabad from respondent No. 3 Aman Singh on lease as a 'shikmi Kashtkar' from the year 1966-67. Therefore, he became an occupancy tenant of the suit land and thereafter under the provision of Sectio
Shri Balaganesan Metals v. M. N. Shanmugham Chetty
Vijaya Singh v. Competent Authority (S.D.O.), Tarana
Ambika Prasad Thakur v. Ram Eqbal Bai (dead) by his legal representatives
Nurugesam Pillai v. Gnana Sambandha Pandare Sannadhi
referred to : Basant Kumar v. State of M.P.
Gopal Krishnaji Ketkar v. Mohamed Haji Latif
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.