SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(MP) 187

T.S.DOABIA
KHAJJANSINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.P.Gupta, Suryavanshi

T. S. DOABIA, J.

( 1 ) THIS petition has been preferred against an order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Vidisha in Sessions Trial No. 195 of 1995. This is dated 2nd of December, 1995. A charge under S. 307 read with S. 149 of the Indian Penal Code (for short IPC) stands framed against the petitioners. This order is being impugned in the present petition. Accused Khajjansingh and Sanmansingh are alleged to given a lathi blow, Ramkishore is said to have given a sword blow and Kalyansingh is also said to have given a lathi blow.

( 2 ) THE argument advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioners is that this is not a fit case for framing a charge under S. 307 of the IPC. According to him, the nature of the injuries should be examined at this stage and if these are not of such a nature which is likely to cause death then charge under S. 307 of the IPC should not have been framed.

( 3 ) INJURY No. 1 on the person of one of the injured, Iqbal be noticed. It is as under :"1. Lacerated wound 4. 5 cms. x 1 cm. x 1 cm. deep obliquely placed over the parietal region. Bleeding present. 2 and 3. *** ***".

( 4 ) INJURIES which are on the person of injured, Rais Khan be also noticed.







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top