SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(MP) 658

S.C.PANDEY
KANRAJ KHATRI – Appellant
Versus
NATHURAM JAIN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AJIT SINGH, RAJESH PANCHOLI

S. C. PANDEY, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision has been filed by the defendants against the appellate order dated 10-4-96, passed by IIIrd Additional Judge to the Court of District Judge, Bastar, in Misc. Civil Appcal No. 3 of 1996. The lower appellate Court has reversed the order passed by the trial Court refusing the grant of temporary injunction.

( 2 ) THE non-applicant/plaintiff filed a suit for declaration that he was entitled to right of easement in respect of light and air passing from the windows of the eastern wall of his house and he also claimed permanent injunction that the applicants/defendants shall be restrained from constructing any structure within three meters of his house or any other distance determined by the Court. It was also claimed that a mandatory injunction be issued to the applicants/defendants that in case, they have obstructed the light and air to the house of the non-applicant, then they be asked to remove the structure obstructing the light and air going to the house of the nonapplicant.

( 3 ) SHORTLY stated, the case of the nonapplicant was that he had constructed a house on Plot No. 124/7, Sheet No. 91, area 1284 sq. ft. in Sadar Ward, Jagdalpur. The applican





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top