SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(MP) 117

N.P.SINGH, V.K.AGRAWAL
RAJENDRA TIWARI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.A.RAVARTSEN, SURENDRA SINGH

V. K. AGRAWAL, J.

( 1 ) THE accused/appellants have been convicted for offence punishable under Section 302 and 302 r/w. Sec. 34 of the IPC for having intentionally cased the death of Gendalal and Narayan in furtherance of their common intention and have been sentenced on each of the above counts to life imprisonment and to pay fine Rs. 2000/- and in default to undergo R. I. for 2 years, in S. T. No. 25 of 1992, impugned judgment dated 6-10-1994. Appellants feeling aggrieved by the said conviction as sentence imposed on them, have filed the present appeal.

( 2 ) THE prosecution case stated in brief is that, Khasra No. 33/4 and khasra 33/5, area 3 acres is an agricultural land at village Dungaria, Known as 'tagrawala Khet' (which hereinafter will be called 'disputed land' for convenience ). Chunnilal was the Bhumi-Swami of the said disputed land and his son Shivji received the same in his share in partition by way of family settlement and his name was also mutated thereon. Shivji had sold the disputed land by registered sale deed to Satyendra Kumar and Indra Kumar, who are the sons of Narayan, alias, Ram Narayan and Gendalal, whereafter their names were also recorded in the record o




















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top