SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(MP) 95

A.K.MATHUR, S.K.KULSHRESTHA
MANTRAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.S.AHLUVALIA, S.L.Kochar

S. K. KULSHRESBTBA, J.

( 1 ) THE appellants have preferred this appeal against their convtction for offence under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentence of imprisonment for life as also under Section 323 and 323/34. I. P. C. and sentend of RI, for six months under each count to each of the appellants by the judgment dated 7-9-1994 of the learned Third Additional Sessions Judge. Raipur, passed in Sessions Trial No. 302/93.

( 2 ) THE appellants were indicted for the said offences for intentionally causing death of Kejuram son of Nanku Rawat on 7-3-1993 at about 9. 00 A. M. in village Alesur and for voluntarily causing hurt to Kashiram. Radhe shyam. Mathurabai, Kalabai and Saraswatibai in furtherance of their common intention.

( 3 ) PROSECUTION story, in brief, was that there was dispute between the two parties concerning property. On the date of the incident, the appellants armed with lathis came to the place where Kejuram had gone to ease himself and assaulted him. When the members of the family of Kejuram intervened to save Kejuram, the accused persons also belaboured them. The report of the incident was lodged at Police Station Kharora. District Rai













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top