SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(MP) 249

High Court Of Madhya Pradesh
S. K. DUBEY, S. P. KHARE
SHOBHAU ALIAS SHUBHAU - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M.P. - Respondents
Cri. A. 845 Of 1989
Decided On : 04/30/1997

Advocates Appeared:
A.K.KHASKALAM, J.S.THAKUR

In a case where the entire case of the prosecution rests on circumstantial evidence, all circumstances from which the conclusion of guilt is to be drawn must be fully established.

Headnote:

CRIMINAL APPEAL - SECTION 302, 404 OF IPC - FACT OF THE CASE - Deceased Lagnibai alias Buchwainbai was found dead near a dam. The appellant was convicted of murder under Section 302 and theft under Section 404 of the Indian Penal Code. The appellant appealed the conviction.

Fact of the Case:

The deceased Lagnibai alias Buchwainbai was found dead near a dam. The appellant was convicted of murder under Section 302 and theft under Section 404 of the Indian Penal Code. The appellant appealed the conviction.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the cause of death and that the appellant was not seen in the company of the deceased. The court also found that the recovery of the deceased's ornaments from the appellant was not sufficient to prove that he was the murderer.

Issues: 1. Whether the prosecution proved the cause of death? 2. Whether the appellant was seen in the company of the deceased? 3. Whether the recovery of the deceased's ornaments from the appellant was sufficient to prove that he was the murderer?

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court held that the prosecution failed to prove the cause of death because the post-mortem examination did not reveal any injuries and the body was too decomposed to determine the cause of death. 2. The court held that the prosecution failed to prove that the appellant was seen in the company of the deceased. 3. The court held that the recovery of the deceased's ornaments from the appellant was not sufficient to prove that he was the murderer because there was no evidence of last seen or unusual conduct by the appellant.

Final Decision: The court set aside the appellant's conviction for murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and maintained his conviction for theft under Section 404 of the Indian Penal Code.

S. K. DUBEY, J.

( 1 ) APPELLANT has filed this appeal from Jail against his conviction and sentence of Life Imprisonment under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and conviction under Section 404 of the Indian Penal Code, sentence 3 years R. I. , recorded in Sessions Trial No. 21/89 vide judgment dated 29th July, 1989, by the Additional Sessions Judge, Khairagarh (district Rajanandgaon ).

( 2 ) THE prosecution case in brief is thus. The deceased Lagnibai alias Buchwainbai, aged about 80 years, mother of Maniram (P. W. 5) by caste Dhobi after taking her meals, on 12-11-1988 at about 10. 00 a. m. left to wash the clothes at the house of Santuram (P. W. 1) in village Dungaria. She was wearing gold and silver ornaments. When she did not return home, Maniram P. W. 5 lodged the report on 16-11-1988 to that effect, which was recorded in Rojnamcha Sanha (Ex. P. 8) at police out post Salhewada at serial No. 253. After the report, G. D. Dharmagude (P. W. 17) Assistant Sub-Inspector of Police left for search on 17-11-1988 and to investigate the matter. He also directed constables to go and enquire. When the Police Party reached near the dam of Nainiya village, Maniram (P. W. 5) again met them and informed that the dead body of his old mother is lying at Mainiya Dam. A Dehati Nalish (Ex. P. 9) and on that Marg Intimation (Ex. P. 10) were recorded. G. D. Dharamgude (PW 17) reached at the spot where he prepared a Panchnama Lash (Ex. P. 2) and then sent the dead body for post-mortem examination Dr. Ashok Khare (P. W. 18) performed the autopsy on 18-11-1988 and found the condition of thebody thus :"badly decomposed body, full of maggots skeletalised, head, neck and legs present. Soft tissues of head, neck and legs are absent, only bones remains, each bone separated easily from other, skull is empty, only small quantity of fluid material is there; brain highly tangul, eosophagatus trachea all are absent destroyed by maggots and decomposition process, very small quantity of soft tissue present over abdomen; lower chest right arm separated from body due to decomposition; two silver ring present in wrist, three present in left wrist foot wear present in both foot; all cavites are full with maggots. No injury mark seen over bone and present soft tissues. "the Doctor did not find any external or internal injury on the body. He opined that it is difficult to say the cause of death as no evidence detected on post mortem. The time of death since post mortem is more than 7 days. Post mortem report is Ex. P. 13-A.

( 3 ) ON 1-12-1988, the accused was called at the police station, where he gave information under Section 27 of the Evidence Act which was recorded at Ex. P. 3. In pursuance of that information, the appellant took out an old bag (Jhola) kept under a stone in the Nallah of Bhadbhadi cut Dam from which one gold mohar (Art. A), one gold Utarna (Art. E), one silver sutiya (Art. B), one pair of silver Ainthii/potie (Art. C) and one silver patta (Art. D) were seized vide seizure memo (Ex. P. 4 ). All these articles were old which were identified by Maniram (P. W. 5) and Amritbai (P. W. 6) to be those belonging to the deceased, in the identification test held on 19-12-1988 by Narendra Kumar Sharma (P. W. 15), Naib Tahsildar. Test identification memo, is Ex. P. 7. After investigation the accused was put to trial under Section 302 and Section 404 of the Indian Penal Code. He denied the charges.

( 4 ) THE prosecution examined in all 19 witnesses and exhibited 15 documents. There is no eye-witness in the case. The trial Court after appreciation of circumstantial evidence of Maniram Jharia (P. W. 10) of last seen and recovery of gold and silver ornaments at the instance of the accused, convicted and sentenced the accused as above.

( 5 ) IN a case where the entire case of the prosecution rests on the circumstantial evidence, all circumstances from which conclusion of guilt is to be drawn must be fully established. It is well settled that there is a long d










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top