SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(MP) 462

TEJ SHANKAR
RAMESH VERMA – Appellant
Versus
LAJESH SAXENA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.G.Apte, J.P.SHRIVASTAVA, M.M.Kaushik, R.D.Jain

TEJ SHANKAR, J.

( 1 ) THESE three first appeals (F. A. No. 29, 30 and 31 of 1991) arise out of Judgment and decree dated 31-1-91 passed by the Fifth Additional Judge to the Court of District Judge, Gwalior. As all the appeals arise out of the same judgment they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.

( 2 ) SMT. Lajesh Saxena filed a suit for partition and separate possession of her 1/8 share in the property in dispute. She also prayed for mesne profits according to her share in the usufruct of her property. The admitted pedigree is as follows :there is also no dispute between the parties that the property detailed in para 2 belonged to Bhagwan Prasad. Bhagwan Prasad died in 1952 leaving his widow Smt. Jaydevi and a son Jagan Verma. Jagan Verma died in 1967 leaving his son Ramesh Verma, defendant No. 1, widow Smt. Prabhavati, defendant no. 2 and mother Jaydevi as his L. R. The plaintiff alleged that after the death of Bhagwan Prasad the name of his son Jagan Verma and widow Jaydevi was entered in village record as Pakka tenant in accordance with the provisions of Madhya Bharat Land Revenue and Tenancy Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as the M. B.


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top