S.P.KHARE
BHAWNA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is a petition under S. 407 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for transfer of Sessions Trial No. 102 of 1996 from Seoni to Jabalpur or Indore.
( 2 ) IT is not in dispute that non-applicant No. 2 Vinod Kumar Rai is an advocate practising at Seoni. He is facing trial for the offences punishable under Ss. 363, 366, 342, 328 and 506-B Indian Penal Code on the report of applicant No. 1 Ku. Bhavna daughter of applicant No. 2 Madan Babel in the Court of II Additional Sessions Judge, Seoni. The Bar Association, Seoni in its general meeting passed a resolution comdemning the act of the police in arresting Vinod Kumar Rai and ill-treating him. A copy of that resolution is Annexure A. This resolution was passed on the complaint of Vinod Kumar Rai. He has filed a Civil Suit under S. 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 alleging that applicant No. 1 Bhavna is his wife. She appeared in that civil suit to contest it. She made an application to the effect that she is not getting a suitable lawyer from Seoni to defend her in the civil suit. The non-applicant No. 2 got the summons issued to her giving her addresses of Ratlam, Mandsour and Jaipur without any order of the C
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.