SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(MP) 669

TEJ SHANKAR
BAIJNATH SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.K.SHARMA

TEJ SHANKER. J.

( 1 ) THIS revision petition is directed against the order dated 31-8-1996 passed by Shri M. L. Tiwari. Second Additional Sessions Judge, Ashoknagar, Guna, It has arisen out of the following facts.

( 2 ) THE prosecution claimed that applicant was found in possession of a sword measuring 3 balist 10 angul on 1-2-1991 of which he had no licence at the time of his arrest in the Haar of Village Raipura. The learned trial court after consideling the evidence on record held the accused guilty of the offence punishable u/sec. 25 (1) (a) of the Arms Act and convicted and sentenced him under that section to a term of one year R. I. and a fine of Rs. 100/ -. An appeal was preferred against that order which was rejected by the learned Appellate Court. Hence this revision.

( 3 ) THE learned counsel for the petitioner contended that in the petitioner case the petitioner was charged and tried u/sec. 25 (a) of the Arms Act. It was mentioned in the charge that he was found in possession of a sword measuring 3 Balist 10 Angul and 2 Angul in width at the Haar of Village Raipura and the offence shown was u/sec. 25 (a) of the Arms Act. The contention of the learned Counsel is that ther






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top