SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(MP) 598

AJIT SINGH, A.K.PATNAIK
Hardeep Singh Anand – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Appellant-in-person; Kumaresh Pathak, Deputy Advocate General, for the State.

Judgement

A.K. PATNAIK, C.J. :- This is an appeal filed under Section 2(1) of the M. P. Uchcha Nyayalaya (Khand Nyaypeeth Ko Appeal) Adhiniyam, 2005 against the order dated 24-8-2007 passed by the learned single Judge in W.P. No. 4638 of 2007.

2. The relevant facts briefly are that the appellant was running a Coaching Centre named "Deepika Classes" preparing students for taking Pre-Medical Test, Pre-Engineering Test and other tests for admissions to MBBS, Dental, Engineering, IIT courses. On 8-6-1992, a raid was conducted in the house of the appellant at the instance of Shri Raghava Chandra, the then Collector, Jabalpur and thereafter a Criminal Case No. 314 of 2004 under Sections 420 read with Section 34, IPC was registered against the appellant. After investigation, a charge-sheet was filed and after trial, the appellant was acquitted on 26-8-2004. The appellant then filed Writ Petition No. 4368 of 2004 contending inter alia that although the appellant was in police custody in Police Station, Gorakhpur since 10.00 p.m. on 8-6-1992, he was unnecessarily handcuffed by the Police and a number of daily newspapers published his photographs and his sister, who loved him, on seeing his p






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top