SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(MP) 681

P.K.JAISWAL
Tej Singh – Appellant
Versus
Rewa Ram – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Amit Lahoti, for Petitioner; R.K. Sharma, Mohd. Irshad, P.L., for Respondents.

ORDER :- Heard.

2. By taking aid of inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., petitioners had filed this petition for quashing the criminal proceedings initiated against them for an offence punishable under Sections 406,420 and 120-B of I.P.C. and consequential order passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vidisha on 23.08.2007 by which he directed the Supdt. of Police, Vidisha to investigate the same under Section 156 (3) of Criminal Procedure Code.

3. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner No. 1 entered into an, agreement to sell over an area of 9.95 hectares of Survey No. 171 /2/2 situated at Village Khemkheda, Tehsil and District Vidisha in favour of respondents No. 1 and 2 for a consideration of Rs.9 lakhs on the ground that he is exclusive owner and title holder of the said land and he need money for his personal necessity. On 29.07.2003, he executed an agreement with the respondents Nos. 1 and 2 vide Annexure P/3. As per agreement, on 29.07.2003 he received Rs.4 lakhs through. draft and cheque from the respondents No.1 and 2. The balance amount of Rs.5 lakhs was to be paid on or before 28.07.2004, with a condition that he will execute the sale deed on or























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top