SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(MP) 658

ARUN MISHRA
Shailendra Koshti – Appellant
Versus
Kavita Koshti – Respondent


2
Advocates Appeared:
N. C. Beohar, for Petitioner; S. K. Dubey, for Respondent.

ORDER :- This writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner as against an order passed by the Family Court, Jabalpur refusing to execute the decree for restitution of conjugal right.

2 Petitioner Shri Shailendra Koshti has filed an application under Section 9 of Hindu Marriage Act before the Family Court, Jaipur, Rajasthan in which an ex parte order was passed ordering the restitution of conjugal rights as against the respondents. Decree was sought to be executed at Jabalpur as against the property of the respondents. The Family Court, Jaipur has transferred the decree for execution under Order 21 Rule 6 of CPC.

3. Reply was filed by respondent wife Smt. Kavita Koshti contending that restitution case was filed in order to create the pressure. She has filed a case under Section 498-A of IPC as against petitioner, his parents and brother, which is pending at the Jabalpur Court in which the prosecution case is already over. Case is at the final hearing stage. In that case on being found guilty, there is likelihood of conviction being recorded. In order to put pressure, execution of decree of restitution of conjugal rights has been sought. An application under Section 13 of Hindu Ma










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top