SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(MP) 194

ARUN MISHRA
Ramesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Lata Devi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A. D. Deoras, Sr. Counsel, with R. Jaiswal, for Appellant; Imtiyaaz Hussain with R. B. Patel, for Respondents.

JUDGMENT :- These two appeals have been filed against an order dated 8-11-2005 passed in Civil Suit No. 26A/2005 by Second Additional District Judge, Khandwa. M. A. No. 3544/2005 has been filed as against rejection of the application under Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 whereas M. A. No. 3757/2005 has been filed as against rejection of the prayer to appoint the receiver.

2. Plaintiff/appellant has filed a suit before the Court below for rendition of accounts and permanent injunction restraining the defendants from carrying on the business in the name and style of M/s. Antique Stores, Bombay Bazar, Khandwa. Plaintiff has come with the case that on 1-9-1971 a partnership firm was constituted, it was duly registered under the provisions of the the Partnership Act, 1932 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). Initially the partnership was entered between Shivalal, father of the plaintiff and Rishi Kumar, Rishi Kumar was elder brother of the plaintiff Ramesh Kumar. Shivalal died on 14-5-1979. Firm was continued a deed of partnership was executed on 15-5-1979, got registered on 20-6-1979 with the Registrar, Firm and Societies. Atul Kumar, son of Rishi Kumar subsequently desired to become a partner


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top