SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(MP) 223

DHIRENDRA MISHRA
Jhabbu Lal – Appellant
Versus
Purroo – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sunil Sahu, for Applicant; Ajit Singh, Y. C. Sharma, for Respondents.

ORDER :- This Civil Revision is directed against the order dated 6-5-96 passed by 2nd Civil Judge Class-II, Raipur in Civil Suit No. 119-A/94 whereby the application of the non-applicant/plaintiff under O. 22, R. 3 of the C. P. C. for bringing Legal Representatives of deceased Puroo has been allowed and name of the respondents No. 1.1 to 1.4 has been ordered to be substituted in place of deceased/Puroo.

2. The short question involved for adjudication of this Civil Revision is that whether an application under O. 22, R. 3 of the C. P. C. for substitution, preferred after expiry of 90 days from the date of the death of plaintiff, can be considered and allowed in the absence of an application for setting aside abatement under O. 22, R. 9 of the C. P. C.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that plaintiff Puroo died on 15-5-89 and respondent No. 1.1 to 1.4 Legal Representatives filed application for bringing them as Legal Representatives of plaintiff on 22-11-89, admittedly, after a period of 90 days of the limitation prescribed for the same, when the suit stood abated.

4. The above application was not maintainable in the absence of an application under O. 22, R. 9 of the C. P. C.













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top