DHIRENDRA MISHRA
Jhabbu Lal – Appellant
Versus
Purroo – Respondent
2. The short question involved for adjudication of this Civil Revision is that whether an application under O. 22, R. 3 of the C. P. C. for substitution, preferred after expiry of 90 days from the date of the death of plaintiff, can be considered and allowed in the absence of an application for setting aside abatement under O. 22, R. 9 of the C. P. C.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that plaintiff Puroo died on 15-5-89 and respondent No. 1.1 to 1.4 Legal Representatives filed application for bringing them as Legal Representatives of plaintiff on 22-11-89, admittedly, after a period of 90 days of the limitation prescribed for the same, when the suit stood abated.
4. The above application was not maintainable in the absence of an application under O. 22, R. 9 of the C. P. C.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.