SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(MP) 957

A.M.SAPRE, A.K.PATNAIK, S.S.JHA
Anandilal Chourasia – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates apperaed:
Naman Nagrath, for Petitioners; Vijay K. Shukla, Dy. AG. for Respondents.

Judgement

A. K. PATNAIK, C.J. :- The petitioner No.1 is an Advocate from village Patna Tamoli; Thana Saleha, Tahsil Gunor, District Panna. The petitioner No.2 is a retired Government Servant from the same village Patna Tamoli. On 5-8-2002, one Mallu Sen, aged about 70 years, expired in village Patna Tamoli. Next morning, when preparations were made for his funeral, Smt. Kuttibai, his wife, jumped on to the funeral pyre and died. The incident got wide publicity and the State Government set up an inquiry and a team of State Commission for Women went to village Patna Tamoli and submitted a report. The cabinet of the State Government took a decision to stop all kinds of financial assistance to Patna Tamoli Gram Panchayat for a period of two years and also requested the Central Government not to extend any financial assistance to the Gram Panchayat. This decision of the State Government was communicated by a letter dated 28-8-2002 of the Secretary, Panchayat and Rural Development Department to the Chief Executive Officer, district Panchayat, Panna, a copy of which has been annexed as Annexure P/6. Aggrieved, the petitioners have filed this writ petition as a public interest litigation pr












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top