SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(MP) 308

P.K.JAISWAL
Dilip Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Vijay Bahadur Singh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
N. K. Gupta, for Appellant; J. P. Mishra, for Respondent.

JUDGMENT :-

Heard on admission.

This appeal is filed by the objector against the judgment and order dated 8-2-2008 passed by the Second Additional District Judge (FTC) Ganj Basoda, District Vidisha, in Civil Appeal No. 25-Aj08, by the said order, the Second Additional District Judge dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant and affirmed the order dated 17-9-2007 passed by the Executing Court, Ganj Basoda, in Execution Case No. 20-A/63x94, whereby objection of the appellant was rejected.

2. Short facts of the case are that Maan Singh, father of respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and husband of respondent No.3 filed a suit bearing Civil Suit No. 20Aj63x94 against Pratap S/o Hukum Singh and State of Madhya Pradesh through Collector, Vidisha, in the Court of Civil Judge Class-II, Basoda, which was decreed on 11-11-1965. Trial Court directed that defendant No.1 Pratap Singh shall hand over the possession of the disputed land (Survey Numbers 143, 146, 152. 164, 169, 185, 186, 188 and 205 situated in Village Madiya Peeniya, Tahsil Basoda. District Vidisha) within one month from the date of the judgment. In case of default of handing over possession as above, the defendant No. 1 shall pay mesne profi


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top