SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(MP) 772

BHAWANI SINGH, S.L.JAIN
Ambika Prasad Bakshi – Appellant
Versus
Onkar Prasad Saini – Respondent


Advocates:
A. S. Usmani, for Appellants; P. S. Das, for Respondents.

Judgement

S. L. JAIN, J. :- Being aggrieved by the order dated March 20, 2003, passed by the learned single Judge, in Writ Petition No. 5498/2000, appellants have filed this Letters Patent Appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent.

2. The brief resume of the facts required to be stated for disposal of this appeal is as follows :-

A Civil Suit No. 76-A/61 was filed in the Court of Civil Judge Class II, Sagar by Babu Gokul Prasad as plaintiff against the defendants Laxman and Jairam, alleging that he purchased the suit-land bearing Khasra No. 503, area 5 acres, situate at Moza Sagar Khas, Tahsil and District Sagar, from Babu Shiv Prasad and Babu Kashi Prasad on 30-11-1958. The defendants entered into illegal possession of the said land. They neither paid the damages nor delivered possession of the suit-land in spite of notice by the plaintiff.

3. The defendants pleaded that the sale-deed in favour of the plaintiff dated 3-11-1958 is a fictitious and sham transaction which was not meant to be acted upon. It was only a collusive transaction. Gokul Prasad, having lost the civil suit preferred Civil Appeal No. 68-A/64 which was dismissed vide judgment and decree dated 9-9-1965 and thereb





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top