G.P.SINGH, K.K.ADHIKARI
Sahara India – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
G. P. SINGH, C.J. :- The petitioner is a partnership firm. The petitioner carries on business which it styles as "Bank Deposit Division". The features of the scheme are set out in a printed pamphlet Annexure-P-2. The petitioner receives a deposit of Rs. 200/- from every applicant called account holder. The depositor gets from the petitioner a Reinvestment Deposit Plan receipt of a Nationalised/Scheduled Bank in his name which entitles him to receive Rs. 296/- after 120 months, i.e. ten years, from the bank directly. Although not so mentioned in Annexure-P-2, it was admitted before us by the learned counsel for the petitioner that out of the amount of Rs. 200/- received by the petitioner from a depositor, Rs. 100/- are retained by the petitioner and the remaining Rs. 100/- are alone deposited in a bank which issues a Reinvestment Deposit Plan receipt entitling the depositor to receive Rs. 296/- after ten years. The amount so deducted is referred to as deduction of a portion of interest in para 5 of Annex.-P-2 but in truth as stated earlier it is a deduction of half of the principal amount which an applicant deposits. No applicant is entitled to claim back the said deducted
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.