SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(MP) 74

A.P.SEN, G.G.SOHANI
Laxminarayan – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. , Bhopal – Respondent


Advocates:
G.M. Chafekar, for Applicant; S.S. Sharma, for the State; R.C. Mukati for Respondent No. 3.

Judgement

SEN, J. : - This is a petition by Shri L. N. Trivedi, under Article 226 of the Constitution, directed against an order of the State Government dated the 25th June, 1970, for his removal as a councillor of the Municipal Council, Mahidpur, under the provisions of Section 41 (2) of the Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1961.

2. Shortly stated, the facts are these: The petitioner is an Advocate of this Court, practising at Mahidpur. He was appearing as counsel against the Municipal Council in a suit wherein the plaintiff had claimed the relief of perpetual injunction against the Council. That suit was eventually decreed and the petitioner, as counsel, had put the decree into execution. He was elected as a councillor in December, 1968. Despite his election as councillor, he continued to appear as a counsel for the decree-holder in the execution proceedings. These proceedings were taken by the decree-holder under the provisions of Order 21 Rule 32 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Meanwhile the decree-holder died and the petitioner applied for substitution of the names of his legal representatives under Order 21, Rule 16 of the Code. He also filed a vakalatnama on their behalf on
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top