SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(MP) 116

B.R.DUBE, S.M.N.RAINA
Chamarin – Appellant
Versus
Budhiyarin – Respondent


Advocates:
Ram Kumar Verma, for Applicant; N. S. Kale, for Respondents.

Judgement

RAINA, J. : - The following questions have been referred to this Bench by the learned single Judge for decision :

(i) Whether rejection of a plaint on grounds other than those specified in Order 7, Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure amounts to a decree?

(ii) Whether the dismissal of a suit for non-compliance with the provisions of Order 6, Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure amounts to a decree and is as such appealable?

2. The aforesaid questions arose before one of us (Raina, J.) in civil revision No. 825 of 1971 - Mst. Chamarin v. Sukhram - in the following circumstances. The petitioner had filed a suit against the non-applicant for a declaration that she was entitled to half share in 4.37 acres of land and for joint possession of her share. On an application filed by the defendants under Order 6, Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code') for better particulars an order was passed by the trial Judge on 3-7-1971 directing the petitioner to furnish better particulars. The petitioner furnished certain particulars; but as, in the opinion of the Court, proper particulars had not been furnished, the suit was dismissed by the impugned ord




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top