SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(MP) 12

P.K.TARE, M.L.MALIK
Madanlal Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
Kamlesh Nigam – Respondent


Advocates:
R.K. Pandey, for Applicant; B.C. Verma, for Respondent.

Judgement

TARE, C. J. : - This case was referred by a Single Bench to consider the guestion whether during the pendency of a stay order passed by the High Court in a Civil Revision, the trial Court could pass an order of attachment before judgment under Order 38, Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

2. The facts leading to the present reference are as follows. The respondent is the land-lady and the petitioner is her tenant. The respondent filed a suit for eviction and for recovery of arrears of rent, which is registered as Civil Suit No. 210-A of 1970. The trial Judge passed an order, dated 16-2-1971, striking out the defence of the present petitioner on the ground mentioned in Section 13 (2) read with Section 13 (6) of the M. P. Accommodation Control Act, 1961. Against that order, the defendant filed a revision in this Court, which was registered as Civil Revision No. 312 of 1971. This Court, by its order, dated 24-9-1971, allowed the revision and remanded the case to the trial Court for a fresh decision on the question of striking out the defence.

3. Thereafter, the trial Judge passed an order, dated 7-1-1972, in pursuance of the remand order and again ordered the defence to be s






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top