SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(MP) 1236

R.S.JHA
Ram Krishan – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Surendra Singh for appellants;
Aseem Dixit, Government Advocate for State•

JUDGMENT

1. The appellants have assailed the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Begumganj, District Raisen, dated 21.10.2002 passed in ST No. 202/2001 being aggrieved by their conviction under section 498A of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as 'IPC') under which sentence of one year's rigorous imprisonment with fine of rupees two hundred and fifty has been imposed on each of them. Apart from which appellant No.1 Ram Krishan has been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for ten years under section 304B of the IPC and appellants No.2, 3 and 4 have been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for seven years under section 304B of the IPC.

2. The case against the appellants is that the deceased Vineeta, who was the wife of appellant No.1 sister-in-law of appellant No.2 and daughter-in-law of appellants No.3 and 4, entered into wedlock with appellant No. 1 on 26.4.2001 in a community wedding ceremony of the Sahu community, thereafter the appellants started demanding a television. motorcycle and cooler as dowry. The deceased Vineeta visited her parents twice after marriage and she had complained about this demand to her mother. Her parents had thereafter counselled appellan




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top