SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(MP) 218

U.C.MAHESHWARI
Sunita Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
S.C. Dutt with S.K. Tiwari for applicants;
J .K. Jain, Government Advocate for State.

ORDER

1. This revision petition is directed against the order dated 30.10.2004 passed by the First Additional Session Judge, Umaria in S.T. No. 117/ 2004, whereby the direction for framing charges against the applicants under Section 498-A/34. 304-B and in alternative 306 of I.P.C. has been given and the same have been framed.

2. The prosecution case in brief is that the deceased Mamta was married with applicant No.2 Rakesh @ Gudda Sharma before four years from the date of incident, i.e.. 14.7.2002. On this day, deceased Mamta poured kerosene on herself and blazed, immediately she was shifted to the Public Health Centre, Chandia, and from there she was referred to Medical College, Jabalpur, during the treatment she succumbed to death due to burn injuries. As per procedure, initially preliminary enquiry \Vas held and on the basis of such enquiry Crime No. 166/02 was registered by police Chandia on date 3.10.2002 for offence under Section 304 B, 306/ 34 of lPC against the applicants. As per the contents of FIR, the applicant No.2 was married before four years in the year 1998 and at the time of marriage he demanded a 'Mohanmala' (a kind of golden chain) but due to inability of the pare

























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top