SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(MP) 589

S.K.GANGELE
Mhow Hosiery Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Jitendra – Respondent


Advocates:
J.P. Cama with G.S. Patwardhan for petitioner;
S.H. Moyal for respondent.

ORDER

1. These are the bunch of the petitions filed by the petitioner M/s. Mhow Hosiery Pvt. Ltd. against the common order passed by the Industrial Court allowing the appeals of the respondents' workers.

2. The facts of all the cases are similar and Industrial Court decided the appeals by a common order. hence all the petitions are being decided by this common order. for the purpose of facts of the case. facts of W.P. No. 277/2005 has been considered.

3. The- respondent was working in the petitioner company, he was employed w.e.f. 1.10.1993 and his services have been discontinued w.e.f. 8.9.2001. On 8.8.2001 the respondent worker submitted an application of resignation mentioning that he was working in dispatch department and due to some personal problem. he is submitting his resignation. His resignation was accepted after a period of one month vide order dated 8.9.2001. On 11.9.2001 he signed a printed receipt mentioning that he received an amount of Rs. 31,7041- with regard to arrears of salary. leave and there was no balance remaining hereinafter. It has further been mentioned that "I am withdrawing the application tiled before Labour Court or any other authority and I am waiving m


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top