SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(MP) 1034

A.M.NAIK
Jagram Shakya – Appellant
Versus
Gokul Prasad – Respondent


Advocates:
V.K. Bhardwaj with Anand Bhardwaj for petitioners;
H.K. Agrawal for respondent.

ORDER

1. Plaintiff-respondent instituted a suit for partition and perpetual injunction with allegations that the plaintiff and defendants are children of a common father who owned a property situated at Naka Chandrabadni, Naharwali Mata Road, Lashkar, Gwalior. Their father died on 11.3.1977 in intestate condition. An oral family settlement was effected which was not in accordance with law. Plaintiff being owner to the extent of 1/4th share is entitled to his 1/4th share after effecting partition by metes and bounds. Decree for perpetual injunction has also been sought for restraining the defendants from alienating the disputed property with cut first effecting the partition and consequent allotment of 1/4th share to the plaintiff.

2. Defendants-petitioners submitted their joint written statement. They acknowledged their relationship as well as source of title. According to them, the family settlement was effected in due manner and the same was acted upon. Plaintiff is debarred from claiming any share contrary to the family settlement.

3. An application for temporary injunction was submitted by the plaintiff which was dismissed by the learned trial Judge as well as by the learned lower

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top