A.M.NAIK
Jagram Shakya – Appellant
Versus
Gokul Prasad – Respondent
1. Plaintiff-respondent instituted a suit for partition and perpetual injunction with allegations that the plaintiff and defendants are children of a common father who owned a property situated at Naka Chandrabadni, Naharwali Mata Road, Lashkar, Gwalior. Their father died on 11.3.1977 in intestate condition. An oral family settlement was effected which was not in accordance with law. Plaintiff being owner to the extent of 1/4th share is entitled to his 1/4th share after effecting partition by metes and bounds. Decree for perpetual injunction has also been sought for restraining the defendants from alienating the disputed property with cut first effecting the partition and consequent allotment of 1/4th share to the plaintiff.
2. Defendants-petitioners submitted their joint written statement. They acknowledged their relationship as well as source of title. According to them, the family settlement was effected in due manner and the same was acted upon. Plaintiff is debarred from claiming any share contrary to the family settlement.
3. An application for temporary injunction was submitted by the plaintiff which was dismissed by the learned trial Judge as well as by the learned lower
2. Heeralal v. Kalyan Mal and others = [AIR 1998 SC 618]
4. Estralla Rubber v. Dass Estate (P) Ltd. = [(2001)8 SCC 97]
5. Baldev Singh and others v. Manohar Singh and another = [2006(111) MPWN 97
7. Prem Bakshi and others v. Dharam Dev and others = [2002(1) Supreme 40]
8. Rajesh Kumar Aggarwal and others v. K.K. Modi and others = [AIR 2006 SC 1647]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.