S.B.SINHA, A.R.LAKSHMANAN, V.N.KHARE
National Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Baljit Kaur – Respondent
Khare, C.J.I. -- 1. Leave granted.
2. The question that arises for consideration in these appeals is whether an insurance policy in respect of a goods vehicle would also cover gratuitous passengers in view of the legislative amendment in 1994 to section 147 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
3. The first respondent herein preferred a claim petition for compensation before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Ludhiana (hereinafter referred to as "the Claims Tribunal"), in view of the death of her sixteen-year-old son, Sukhwinder Singh, due to the allegedly reckless driving by the second respondent and driver of the goods vehicle, bearing No. PB-10U-8937, on 19.2.1999. It. was found by the Claims Tribunal that the victim, who was returning in the truck from a marriage ceremony, died as a result of the rash and negligent driving by the driver of the goods vehicle, the second respondent herein. It was an admitted fact that the said vehicle was insured with the appellant Insurance Company.
4. The Claims Tribunal relying upon the decision of this Court in New India Assurance Co. v. Satpal Singh [(2000) 1 SCC 237] accepted the claim petition and rejected the contention of the appellant
1. New India Assurance Co. v. Satpal Singh = [(2000) 1 SCC 237]
6. Bengal Immunity Co. Ltd. v. State of Bihar = AIR 1955 SC 661
2. New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Asha Rani = [(2003) 2 SCC 223]
3. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Devireddy Kanda Reddy = [(2003) 2 SCC 339]
5. Parayankandiyal Eravath Kanapravan Kalliani Amma v. K. Devi = AIR 1996 SC 1963
7. Goodyear India Ltd. v. State of Haryana = AIR 1990 SC 781
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.