A.K.SHRIVASTAVA, S.C.SINHA
Lakhanlal – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
Shrivastava, J. -- 1. Feeling aggrieved by the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 6.8.1997 passed by learned I Additional Sessions Judge, Tikamgarh in ST No.63/94 convicting the appellant under sections 302, 201 and 498A of PC and sentencing him to suffer life imprisonment, 3 years RI respectively, the appellant has preferred this appeal under section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
2. In brief the prosecution's case is that Savitri Bai (hereinafter referred to as deceased) is the wife of appellant. Their marriage took place in the year 1987. The behaviour of appellant was cordial with the deceased upto 3-4 years of the marriage, but, thereafter appellant started ill-treating the deceased and was causing marpeet as well as taunting on her. It is also the case of the prosecution that appellant was making a demand of Rs.5,000/- watch, radio, cycle, etc.
3. In between the night of 28/29.3.1994 appellant caused marpeet to the deceased. It is the further case of prosecution that in between the night of 28/29.3.1994 at 4:00 a.m. appellant went to evacuate and deceased was preparing tea on the stove. Accidentally her sari caught fire from flame of the
2. Hanumant Govind Nargundkar and another v. State of Madhya Pradesh = [AIR 1952 SC 343]
4. Sudama Pandey and others v. State of Bihar = [JT 2001(1) SC 278
6. P. Mani v. State of T.N. = [(2006)3 SCC 161]
5. Subhash Chand v. State of Rajastan = [JT 2001(8) SC 505
1. Ashish Batham v. State of Madhya Pradesh = [2002(2) JLJ 373
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.