SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(MP) 126

S.L.JAIN
Krishna Devi Shrivastava – Appellant
Versus
Ramprasad Shrivastava – Respondent


Advocates:
R.S. Tiwari for appellants;
S.K. Shrivastava for respondents.

JUDGMENT

1. Invoking appellate jurisdiction of this Court under section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 appellants have filed this appeal challenging the legality, validity, propriety and correctness of the judgment and decree dated 4.10.1997, passed by XII Additional District Judge, Jabalpur in Civil Suit No.543-A/94 decreeing respondents-plaintiffs claim to the extent of 2/9th share in the property left behind by Smt. Laxmi Devi.

2. Facts leading to the filing of this appeal in nutshell are that Mahadeo Prasad and Sharda Prasad were real brothers. Sharda Prasad had three sons namely plaintiff Ram Prasad, defendant No.4, Shiv Prasad and Jawala Prasad. Laxmi Devi was the wife of Mahadeo Prasad. Smt. Laxmi Devi purchased the suit plot and constructed house on the half portion and remaining half portion remained vacant. As the parents of plaintiff, defendant No.4 and Jwala Prasad died when they were quite young, they started living with their paternal uncle Mahadevo Prasad. Jwala Prasad was transferred to Pune but his family remained with Mahadevo Prasad. Defendant No.5 Shiv Prasad was transferred to Bhopal. Jwala Prasad continued to live in the newly constructed house of Smt.


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top