S.B.SINHA, DALVEER BHANDARI
Jay Engineering Works Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Industry Facilitation Council – Respondent
Sinha, J. -- 1. Leave granted.
2. The appellant herein is a public limited company engaged in business of manufacturing electronic fans and fuel injection equipments. Respondent No.2 is a small scale industry. It manufactures copper wires. It supplied its products to the appellant herein during the period 28.12.1996 to 3.6.2000. As the appellant Company became sick, its Board of Directors made a reference in terms of section 15 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 (for short "the 1985 Act") on 8.4.1994. The appellant Company was declared as a sick unit by the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (for short "the Board"). A rehabilitation scheme was framed by the Board but it was declared to have failed by an order dated 12.7.2001. By reason of the said order, however, Industrial Development Bank of India (IDBI) was appointed as a operating agency. A fresh report was submitted by the said operating agency on 20.3.2003 which was accepted by the Board whereupon a fresh rehabilitation scheme was sanctioned on 8.4.2003.
3. In the meanwhile, respondent No.2 herein filed a claim petition before the Industry Facilitation Council (for short "the
1. CTO v. Corromandal Pharmaceuticals = [(1997)10 SCC 649]
3. Allahabad Bank v. Canara Bank = [(2000)4 SCC 406]
4. Maruti Udyog Ltd. v. Ram Lal = [(2005)2 SCC 638]
5. Sarwan Singh v. Kasturi Lal = [(1977)1 SCC 750]
8. ICICI Bank Ltd. v. SIDCD Leathers Ltd. = [(2006)10 SCC 452]
6. NGEF Ltd. v. Chandra Developers (P) Ltd. = [(2005)8 SCC 219].
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.