SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(MP) 193

DIPAK MISRA, DEEPAK VERMA
Subhash Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Ajay Mishra for petitioners;
T.S. Ruprah, Additional Advocate General for State.

ORDER

Misra, J. -- 1. The petitioners describing themselves as Pro Bono Publico have invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issue of a writ of mandamus to the respondents to call for the records relating to the lis in question and after examining the same, to issue a writ of certiorari for quashment of the Cabinet decision taken on 6.9.2004 by which a decision has been taken for withdrawal of thousands of criminal cases pending in various criminal Courts in the State.

2. Filtering unnecessary details that have been asseverated in the writ petition, the facts which are essential to be exposited for the purpose of disposal of the writ petition are that the petitioner No.1 is in active politics for a quarter of a century and a Member of Legislative Assembly and presently the State President of Indian National Congress. He had held the office of the Deputy Chief Minister and Cabinet Minister in the State of M.P. for number of years. The petitioner No.2 is the Chairman of M.P. Legal Cell of Indian National Congress and a nominated member in the Executive Council of Barkatulla University, Bhopal and is an Advocate by profession. It is cont
















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top