SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(MP) 981

A.K.MISHRA
Jain Brothers – Appellant
Versus
Bharat Petrolium Corporation Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
S.K. Gangele for petitioner; V.R. Rao for respondents.

ORDER

1. Petitioner is assailing the action of respondent Na. 2 of cancelling the dealership of the petitioner with respect to the petrol pump located at Hoshangabad Road, Bhopal.

2. Petitioner was granted dealership in the year 1978. A sample was taken from the petrol pump of the petitioner on 24.11.2001. Though the seal was found intact, however, the Collector as per order (P-4) dated 5.2.2002 held that petitioner as well as the Junior Supply Officer, bath are responsible far the sample not adhering to the standard Supply of the petitioner was directed to be withheld far a period of 45 days and one increment of Junior Supply Officer was also ordered to be withheld. Petitioner preferred a civil suit. The suit has been withdrawn with liberty to file afresh. A show cause notice (P-2) was issued to the petitioner on 13.12.2001 far termination .of the dealership agreement. In notice (P-2), only one fact is mentioned that from retail .outlet of the petitioner, a sample was collected by the District Authority on 24.11.2001 and sent to Indian Oil Corporation, Nishadpur Laboratory far testing. As per the Laboratory report dated 29.11.2001, the MS sample has failed in distillation test, th







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top