Key Points: - The case concerns grant of leave under section 151 CPC to file a suit against the Municipal Corporation after notices under section 401(1) of the MP Municipal Corporation Act, 1956 (!) . - The Division Bench held that the Code's provisions are not exhausted and courts may devise procedures not prohibited by CPC, resorting to inherent powers for ends of justice or to prevent abuse of process (recognizing inherent power to grant temporary injunction even without a suit in certain scenarios) (!) , (!) , (!) , (!) , (!) . - There is no analogous provision in section 401(1) similar to subsection (2) of section 80 CPC; thus leave under section 151 CPC to file a suit against the Municipal Corporation is not expressly provided (!) , (!) . - The court concluded that the revisions are disposed of and that separate suits may be registered and decided in accordance with law, directing parties to bear their own costs (!) , (!) .

What is the propriety of granting leave under section 151 CPC to file a suit against a Municipal Corporation when there is no express provision under section 401 of the MP Municipal Corporation Act for such leave?

What are the limits and proper use of inherent powers under section 151 CPC to grant temporary injunction or similar relief in the context of a suit against a Municipal Corporation with non-expired notice under section 401?

What is the court's ruling on whether a temporary injunction can be granted under inherent powers before filing a suit or while awaiting expiry of statutory notice under section 401?