SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(MP) 230

K.K.LAHOTI, S.K.KULSHRESTHA
Sudhir Tiwari – Appellant
Versus
Bhagwanti Devi Issrani – Respondent


Advocates:
J.P. Sanghi for appellant

JUDGMENT

Lahoti, J. -- This Letters Patent Appeal is preferred by defendant-tenant aggrieved by the judgment passed by the learned Single Judge in First Appeal No. 735/2000 dated 3.1.2002. The learned trial Court has decreed the suit of respondent-plaintiff under section 12(1)(f) of Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961 but has refused decree to the plaintiff under section 12(1)(c), (k) & (m) of the Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). The learned Single Judge has confirmed the decree under section 12(1)(f) of the Act and has also granted decree to the plaintiff-respondent under section 12(1)(c) of the Act.

2. Short facts of the case are that the appellant is tenant of the plaintiff on the ground floor of houses No. 1243 and 1244. Wright Town, Jabalpur at the rate of Rs. 6,000/- p.m. as per terms and conditions of agreement dated 1.10.1992 (Ex. P/1). The premises were taken for non-residential purposes to run a clinic and the defendant was permitted to carry out repairs to the extent of Rs. 15,000/- for which an amount of Rs. 3,000/was paid to him in cash and the remaining amount of Rs. 12,000/- was to be adjusted in rent at














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top