SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(MP) 221

V.K.AGRAWAL
Kanhaiyalal Negi – Appellant
Versus
Nagarpalik Nigam, Khandwa – Respondent


Advocates:
Z.M. Shah for applicants; Umesh Trivedi for non-applicants.

ORDER

1. The plaintiffs-petitioners filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction against respondent No.1 - Municipal Corporation, Khandwa. It was alleged by them that they had constructed their house after obtaining permission from respondent No. 1 - Corporation. According to them, the construction of their house was completed in the year 1988, and that they are residing therein from the year 1989. However, the respondent No. 1 - Corporation intends to demolish the construction made by them on the ostensible ground that the construction was illegally made and was not as per terms of permission for construction. Hence, it was prayed that the defendant/respondent No. 1 be restrained from demolishing the construction raised by plaintiffs-petitioners.

2. The defendant-respondent No. 1 denied the above averments. It was denied that the construction was made after obtaining permission or that it was completed in the year 1988. It was alleged that the construction was illegal and that the respondent No.1 Corporation was entitled to take action and to demolish the same.

3. During pendency of the suit an application under Order 1 Rule 10 of CPC, was filed by the present respondent No.
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top