SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(MP) 338

FAKHRUDDIN
Tahsildar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Rakesh Saxena for applicant; Padam Singh, Additional Govt. Advocate for
State; Praveen Mishra for respondents No. 2,3 and 4.

ORDER

1. With the consent of the parties, the revision is finally heard.

2. This revision-petition is against the order dated 27.11.2000, passed by Fourth Additional Sessions Judge, Morena in Sessions Trial No. 256/2000, whereby the applicant-accused has been charged for the offence under section 302 of IPC read with sections 27 and 25(1)(b) of the Arms Act.

3. The facts leading to filing this case are as under. The incident had occurred on 18.4.2000 at 8/8:30 a.m. in the morning while 'complainant Subedar Singh s/o Albel Singh, accompanied by his brother Tahsildar Singh and sister Usha was going to the field on the tractor and when he was at some distance of his house, what he saw is that accused Tikam Singh, Prahlad Singh and Ramraj came from the front side; accused Ramraj was armed with gun. It is stated that accused Tikam Singh and Prahlad Singh filthy abused him and also threatened to kill him. Thereafter, it is alleged that accused Ramraj, with intention to kill, fired from his gun at the complainant Subedar Singh, which hit on his abdomen, causing injuries and the blood came out. The incident was witnessed by him, brother Tahsildar Singh and sister Usha. The accused persons






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top